The Papists

Why, at the beginning of course. I’m just kidding, I know what you mean.  The word “catholic” can be used in two ways.  The first is lowercase, and the second is uppercase.

1.  catholic means universal, comprehensive, or all-encompassing.  It comes from the Greek word, katholikos, which comes from the phrase kath’ holou, meaning “about” (kata) “the whole” (holos).

2.  Catholic refers to the Catholic Church and its members.  It comes from the idea that the Catholic Church is the universal Church.  When used in this case, it is capitalized.

Does this answer your question?  God bless!

- Niko

Hi there! Thanks for your question.

CCC #2487 says this:

Every offense committed against justice and truth entails the duty of reparation, even if its author has been forgiven. When it is impossible publicly to make reparation for a wrong, it must be made secretly. If someone who has suffered harm cannot be directly compensated, he must be given moral satisfaction in the name of charity. This duty of reparation also concerns offenses against another’s reputation. This reparation, moral and sometimes material, must be evaluated in terms of the extent of the damage inflicted. It obliges in conscience.

So the Catechism is clear that public reparation is the general way of dealing with an offense. 

In French, reparer simply means to fix. Simply put, we’re called to fix things after committing an offense against someone. 

The first thing that comes to my mind is to simply say sorry and ask for forgiveness in front of the person. You tell them, “I’m sorry. Can you forgive me?” and then it’s on them to forgive you. If you did something that hurt them or damaged their property, you should offer to pay the medical bill or mechanic’s bill or contracter’s bill (or replace whatever you broke or damaged). Financial compensation is a good way to make public reparation for a wrong. Another way that comes to mind is to give of your time—your service to that person. If you, say, trampled your neighbour’s rose bushes because you walked outside and were angry, then you could offer to give an hour of your day during the summer helping your neighbour in their garden. 

On a more serious note, public reparation could mean serving a jail sentence or paying a severe fine. Pleading guilty and accepting your jail time would be a good way to make public reparation. Remember, once you commit a wrong and you realize it is wrong, it is up to you to “make up for it” as best you can. 

I hope I was able to answer your question. Take care!

Your friend,

Olivier

Anon,

I’d say at face value, they’re not lustful. Lust is a desire to use the other person for our own sexual gain or pleasure, and butterflies are simply feelings we get when we encounter someone to whom we’re attracted. I think that if you, as you say, turn the experience of those feelings into an “unhealthy infatuation,” then it could turn into lust. If you do encounter someone who’s really attractive, thank God for their attractiveness, tell Him He did a good job, and move on. As a guy, I can tell you this is really important and effective in making sure we respect and love women rather than using and lusting after them. Hope this helps.

Your friend,

Olivier

Anon,

Forgive me for assuming, but it seems like you might not have a real grasp of why the Church teaches against IVF methods. BadCatholic offers a nicer explanation than I could ever give, so I suggest you take a look at what he has to say. I just got a feeling that you saying “If it wasn’t against Catholic teaching…” might mean that you don’t know why the Church teaches against IVF. And that’s okay, of course. I myself have a long way to go when it comes to Church teaching.

Now, onto your question. In terms of concrete acts, I would highly recommend your friend to chart her cycles/start looking at NFP methods. Natural fertility methods are surprisingly good at helping women conceive children. Q or anyone else who’s familiar with NFP, would you want to offer a comment?

Finally, good on you for praying for her, Anon. Pray that whatever the circumstance, you and your friend will give glory to God. 

Your friend,

Olivier

PSA: Tumblr ate that last ask regarding confession, mortal sin, and pre-marital sex.

Send it again, perhaps?

Anon,

Consider Acts 10:9-15:

The next day, while they were on their way and nearing the city, Peter went up to the roof terrace to pray at about noontime. He was hungry and wished to eat, and while they were making preparations he fell into a trance. He saw heaven opened and something resembling a large sheet coming down, lowered to the ground by its four corners. In it were all the earth’s four-legged animals and reptiles and the birds of the sky. A voice said to him, “Get up, Peter. Slaughter and eat. But Peter said, “Certainly not, sir. For never have I eaten anything profane and unclean.” The voice spoke to him again, a second time, “What God has made clean, you are not to call profane.”

God has given us the right to eat meat. I hope this answers your question.

Your friend,

Olivier

I thought I was confessing adequately but when I told a word, an adjective for that matter, I realized that it had two meanings afterward I said it. Then I felt the need to tell the priest what I meant by that word but I didn’t bother to since I thought that God knew what I meant. Help? I am scrupulous < same anon :)

So, this is my answer to your question, but I think you might want to get a second opinion from FatherAngel or FatherShane.  They have the benefit of having actually given the sacrament.  But, I’ll take a stab at it.

I would think that if the two meanings are radically different, and the priest clearly misunderstood which meaning you meant, it might be better to clarify it.  I don’t think it would invalidate the entire confession, though if you purposely used the double meaning to hide the severity of one of your sins, (which is not what appears happened,) then you might want to consider reconfessing it correctly. 

I think it’s good to remember that God is not trying to trip us up in confession.  While we have a responsibility to confess our sins completely and honestly to the priest, we should not worry too much about whether the confession was licit or invalid etc.  That’s more the priest’s responsibility.

So, I guess what I’m saying is that in this case you need to make the call, if you truly think you might have had an intent to deceive, you should probably revisit the confessional at your next opportunity, if not, just try to be clearer next time. 

Does this answer your question? God bless!

-Niko

Spiritual darkness, AKA spiritual dryness, is described by Victor Parachin at ministrymagazine.com  as

a subjective feeling that God is distant, aloof, even absent. During a time of spiritual dryness, prayers feel empty, hymns are sung without energy, sermons are lifeless, and Scripture appears to have no power over daily life. Often called the “dark night of the soul,” [It was St. John of the Cross who first called it that] it is a time when our sense of God’s absence is painfully felt.

There are several possible causes.

Sometimes sin can lead to periods of spiritual dryness.  When we are prideful, for example, we turn inwards, and in doing so, often cut ourselves off, at least partially, from God and the Church.  By cutting ourselves off from the source of goodness, we become weak, just like a plant that is cut off from water or the Sun.

The Catechism says,

2731 Another difficulty, especially for those who sincerely want to pray, is dryness. Dryness belongs to contemplative prayer when the heart is separated from God, with no taste for thoughts, memories, and feelings, even spiritual ones. This is the moment of sheer faith clinging faithfully to Jesus in his agony and in his tomb. “Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if dies, it bears much fruit.”¹⁸ If dryness is due to the lack of roots, because the word has fallen on rocky soil, the battle requires conversion.

But, as a priest once told me, sometimes spiritual dryness can be given to us by God as a means of purification of the soul.  Think about this, if it becomes more difficult to pray, or we feel that we are not benefiting from it, and yet we do it anyway, why are we doing it?  Obedience to God, which is the essence of humility and love.  Therefore, by struggling with spiritual dryness can lead us to greater love for God. 

Does that make sense?  God bless!

-Niko

Anon,

Consuming a tiny sip of Precious Blood probably puts as much alcohol into your system as drinking an entire glass of fruit juice. 

Besides, a law that does not allow religious exemption for (reasonable consumption of) alcohol, according to the First Amendment, seems to me unjust. It’s not that we should necessarily break such a law, but I feel we can break the letter of this law (no underage drinking without exceptions) because it does not properly represent the spirit of the law (to protect young people from getting smashed and hurting themselves or others).

I don’t think it’s a mortal sin. 

Your friend,

Olivier

That’s a very good question, I don’t think there is a catch-all term that refers to an icon with candles in front of it.  Often times you see these icons in side chapels, but they don’t have to be.

As for “shrines,” Wikipedia has a good section on its use in Catholic terminology.

In the Roman Catholic Code of Canon law, canons 1230 and 1231 read: “The term shrine means a church or other sacred place which, with the approval of the local Ordinary, is by reason of special devotion frequented by the faithful as pilgrims. For a shrine to be described as national, the approval of the Episcopal Conference is necessary. For it to be described as international, the approval of the Holy See is required.”^[11]

Another use of the term “shrine” in colloquial Catholic terminology is a niche or alcove in most – especially larger – churches used by parishioners when praying privately in the church. They were also called Devotional Altars, since they could look like small Side Altars or bye-altars. Shrines were always centered on some image of Christ or a saint – for instance, a statue, painting, mural or mosaic, and may have had a reredos behind them (without a Tabernacle built in).

However, Mass would not be celebrated at them; they were simply used to aid or give a visual focus for prayers. Side altars, where Mass could actually be celebrated, were used in a similar way to shrines by parishioners. Side altars were specifically dedicated to The Virgin Mary, Saint Joseph as well as other saints.

Does this answer your question?  God bless!

-Nikosnature